https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=J92J2F8LA8554
Bitterroot Star Ads
Kearns and Sons

We need more jobs, not less

By Doris Adam, Hamilton

“…it’s just a matter of math.”–That’s what County Commissioner Matt Kanenwisher calls the laying off of 20 hardworking, hardscrabble county workers, or 10% of our county workforce. Ten percent! Actually Matt, they’re not just “math.” They’re real people, our neighbors, who likely make much less than you as a commissioner. They may work much harder, and do their job much better, than our commissioners. Do our commissioners have any compassion for those they’re about to lay off so casually?
I have a simple question: Did the commissioners consider taking a pay cut from their approximate $50,000/year salary before deciding to eliminate these folks? As an example, a 10% cut in their own salary would save one of those jobs! That’s not asking too much, and it would demonstrate fairness and leadership. Was this on the table? If it wasn’t, seems to me it should be.
One other option might be to stop paying Texas consultants who tell our commissioners how to do their jobs. Talk about waste, incompetence and corruption. Or better yet, lay off two of the three newest commissioners, so we’d be back to the ‘old’ number of three. Would save about 4 jobs right there and wouldn’t make any difference in how the county’s managed. You could start with Matt, then Ron Stoltz, who adds less to the discussion than a bump on a log. But to be completely fair and constructive, how about a 10% across-the-board pay cut for all county workers? Right there that’d probably save all 20 positions and not bring calamity to 20 Bitterroot families.
It’s really about competence, fairness, and the right priorities. We need more of all three in our commissioners. And I must say commissioners, we need more jobs in our valley, not 20 less!

One Response to We need more jobs, not less
  1. Adam Reed
    September 11, 2011 | 2:38 pm

    Check out the Mahar article in the Bitterrooot Star. We the county, hired this person for part time work and are spending at least the salary of two county employees on him. We are also paying some fees for who knows what for this employee. Here is a little of the article..

    Mahar will continue to receive his current annual salary of $75,733 through May 31, 2013. He will also continue to receive all benefits including health insurance, paid holidays, life and disability insurance, and retirement contributions. Mahar will also receive an additional $1,500 per month over a twelve month period to purchase an additional year of retirement out of Mahar’s earnings sufficient to allow him to retire with 20 years of service. The county will also continue to cover his errors and omissions insurance for the duration of his employment. The county will also pay $10,000 to Mahar’s attorneys who represented him in the negotiations with the county.

    Wow… As much as we are paying this person it sounds like this person will solve the counties financial problems and job crisis. Actually I think it sounds like they are part of the problem. I know nothing of this person or their qualifications. But I’m sorry. They are not worth the amount we are paying them.

Leave a Reply

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?